Why I Left Institutionalism (Part 2) by Terence Sheridan
(tsherida@faulkner.edu)
Reprinted form the Focus Magazine archives. (http://www.focusmagazine.org/Articles.htm)
The Issue
At work, I had access to some books written by Christians. I would pick up hard copies of debates between such preachers as Roy Cogdill and Guy N. Woods, flip through the pages, and look at the arcane diagrams with arrows and boxes flying all over place. I would think to myself, "What is the big deal?!" Finally I told one of my elders that I intended to study the "institutionalism" issue. He gave me an out-of print book and a notebook of debate charts by A.C. Grider.
As I looked over these materials, I began to understand what "the big deal" was. This was after the local preacher talked to me one day about determining Bible authority for whatever Christians do. I read with interest about the religious inconsistencies among those pushing for projects like "sponsoring churches," church-supported orphans homes and colleges, etc. I read how people with non-institutional convictions were intimidated, threatened, kicked out of the church building, etc. I read about how the church is a divine institution that stands alone and sufficient to do that which Christ assigned to it. It must be noted that some of the material I read was a bit vitriolic in tone, which is lamentable. Nonetheless, my view of the "mean old antis" started to change.
Ultimately, the books were not enough. It's one thing to tell someone to read something like Roy Cogdill's "Walking by Faith," it's quite another to be prepared to defend one's own beliefs (2 Tim. 2:15). If I was to change my mind on any doctrinal matter, then it would have to be done with God's inspired word. Furthermore, I couldn't just be handed a bunch of pat, canned interpretations; I would have be convinced with a credible, straightforward exegesis of the Bible. Over time, and through my own study, I found these things to be true:
1. Besides the universal church (Mt. 16:17-19; 1 Cor. 12:12-27), there were local congregations in the first century (Rom. 16:16; 1 Cor.14:33).
2. None of the congregations mentioned in the Bible, however, tried to dictate to others what to do with their resources. No governing body had oversight over a group of churches; rather elders exercised authority in autonomous congregations (Acts 14:26; I Pet. 5:1-3).
3. There were limits on what Christians and congregations could do for others (2 Th. 3:10; 1 Tim. 5:16).
4. There was a distinction made between individual Christians and congregations of Christians (1 Tim. 5:16). This distinction included expectations that God had of both parties. Congregational responsibilities were clearly designated as such. Other activities, such aiding non-saints, were assigned to individual Christians in general (e.g., Eph. 4:28; Gal. 6:10; Jas. 1:27).
5. The church never had a non-church organization carry out its duties. There were no missionary societies, seminaries, or charitable organizations overseeing finances for benevolence, evangelism, etc. If the New Testament Church could do what God asked of it, then why not now? Or do we think what God has given us is insufficient (2 Peter 1:3)?
6. There is a consistent and authoritative pattern in the New Testament governing the use and distribution of congregational resources (2 Tim. 1:13; 1 Cor. 11:1-2; 1 Cor. 16:1). In a nutshell, churches in the Bible did as God specified: supported evangelism (Phil. 4:15-18; 1 Cor. 9:7-14), spiritual edification (1 Cor. 14:26), and benevolence for the saints (1 Cor. 16:1-3; 1 Tim. 5:16). No more, no less (1 Cor. 4:6). Should we not do the same?
What's the personal application for me? Well, I've been around people who say you can't have a piano playing in the church auditorium on Sunday morning because the Bible says we are to sing. They assert that the Bible teaches by command, approved apostolic example of actions in the New Testament, and things necessarily inferred by logic. Given what I know, I thus suppose I should try to be consistent about what I believe. I've come to the point where I don't think I'll ever be a member of a church that embraces institutionalism. Someone my ask "Isn't that hair-splitting?" Granted, I know a lot of good Christians who disagree with my views on what a congregation of Christians can or cannot do; often, they put me to shame by the exemplary lives they lead. Their churches may be sincere about Bible authority and at times may be more Christ-like than some supposed "sound non-institutional" churches.
That said, I can only view the megachurch phenomenon as being the logical end of institutional practices. When a church decides to melt into the social fabric of the surrounding society by focusing on social issues (civic charity, recreation, politics, secular education, etc.), it becomes no more than a civic club paying lip service to Jesus. Institutionalism is a spiritual distraction which opens the door for spiritual decay; I have personally witnessed this time after time. When Bible authority is overlooked in one area, other areas soon follow. That is why, in many churches, the teaching seems to be more humanistic than godly.
My heart goes out to those in institutional churches who are trying to serve lord the best they know how. Still, when something affects a corporate activity such as worship and when Christians have conscientious objections about what the Bible says, then there will always be more than one church in town (to put it politely). A unity that is based on a unscriptural concept is one I cannot endorse, especially when that unity involves a violation of church autonomy. True, as a human being susceptible to error and sin, I do not claim to have perfect knowledge of the Bible. Maybe I am mistaken about some things, but the question remains: What in good conscience can I do as a Christian, given what I perceive the Bible teaches? That, ultimately, is the question that every Christian must decide for himself on this side of eternity (Rom. 14:26; Phil. 2:12-13; Jas. 4:17; 2 Cor. 5:10).
I would like to make two final points: 1) I was first attracted to my congregation by the godly conduct demonstrated and friendship freely given by other Christians. Later, I accepted their teachings on institutionalism. We can all learn something from this, considering what John 13:34-35 says. 2) You never know what those insurance salesman will pull on you!
Many people will walk in and out or your life, but only true friends will leave footprints in your heart.
To handle yourself, use your head,
To handle others, use your heart.
Anger is only one letter short of danger.
If someone betrays you once, it's his fault. If he betrays you twice, it's your fault.
Great minds discuss ideas;
Average minds discuss events;
Small minds discuss people.
God Gives every bird it's food, but He does not throw it into it's nest.
He who loses money, loses much;
He who loses a friend, loses more;
He who loses faith, loses all.
Beautiful young people are acts of nature, but beautiful old people are works of art.
Learn from the mistakes of others. You can't live long enough to make them all yourself.
The tongue weighs practically nothing, but so few people can hold it.